In January 2015, Fannie Mae will release Collateral Underwriter (CU), a statistical tool for lenders that assesses an individual
appraisal’s risk and quality using the uniformly coded data (known to appraisers as Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD)) from other appraisals.
If the CU program works as intended, it could make appraisers more accountable, improve appraisal quality, and help lenders access loan risk more effectively.
Appraisers are put off by the pending change because the trend has been that increased oversight usually results in more work
and liability for appraisers without increased compensation.
With CU, appraisers will be compared to their peers and to statistical models on every assignment.
Both comparisons could be wrong, but either could lead to an appraiser being asked for numerous clarification revisions, being listed as high risk appraiser, being placed on a do not use list without due process, and ultimately result in a loss of business.
Here is an example output from Collateral Underwriter obtained from Fannie Mae’s online
Introduction to Collateral Underwriter Course
and four issues that cause appraisers anxiety. (Please excuse the poor visual quality of the example; it is the best resolution of a screen capture that we can manage.)
Appraisers often spend hours researching and commenting on lists of AVM comparables, without any additional compensation, because responding to lender stipulations is required when accepting the assignments. Admittedly, CU should have better comparable data
than most AVMs, because the data comes from actual appraisals and includes things like condition, quality, basement finish, and view. However, the typical appraiser has had bad experiences with past AVM data making them nervous about CU’s implementation.
All of the above issues touch on the anxiety that appraisers currently feel about the implementation of Fannie Mae’s CU. These examples are based around the fact
that data is being used by Fannie Mae and lender clients to judge an appraiser’s work, without the appraiser having access to similar information during the appraisal process. If Fannie Mae truly wants to improve appraisal quality, the agency should work
to find a way to provide CU information or warnings to appraisers during the appraisal process so that appraisers can work to improve the quality of their work before submitting a finished product, and/or address issues that the automated system will flag.
Did I leave anything out or do you want to join in the conversation? Let me know in the comments below.
If you find this information interesting or useful, please
to our blog and like us on Facebook.
Also, please support us by making Portland real estate appraisal related comments on our blogs and YouTube
you need Portland, Oregon area residential real estate appraisal services for any reason, please
request appraisal fee quote
or book Gary F. Kristensen to speak
at your next event. We will do everything possible to assist you.
Thanks for reading,